Send us the boundary you want watched.
A concession, a supply shed or a district is enough. Tell us who should get the weekly list and we will scope the project from there.
Swap the manual imagery check and the annual land-cover update for a weekly alert list on the monitoring area you define, flagged within days of the first cloud-free pass.
Someone opens the viewer, pans across the priority districts and flips between this year's imagery and last year's. It takes a while, it depends on who is at the desk, and some districts get looked at less than others.
Or the team waits for the annual land-cover update and finds a clearing long after the fact. By then the land has been burned, planted or sold, and the referral goes out as a letter about something already done.
| Step | The manual check | With Deforestation Alerts |
|---|---|---|
| Finding new clearings | An analyst pans the viewer district by district and compares against an older scene, or waits for the annual land-cover product. | Every week the monitoring area is compared with the pass before it, and new clearings come back as polygons. |
| Sizing what was cleared | The polygon is traced by hand in the GIS and the hectares read off it, when there is time. | Each alert carries a cleared-area estimate from the pass that found it. |
| Building the list for the field office | Coordinates pasted into a spreadsheet or a case form, a few at a time, from whatever the analyst found that week. | One alert list for the week, by polygon, plus an export shaped for an enforcement or supplier referral. |
| Knowing whether a district was actually looked at | Which districts were skipped last month is rarely written down. | Every alert is tied to the pass date it came from, and the whole monitoring area is compared every week there is a clear view. |
| Still yours Reading the evidence, deciding what is a true clearing, and every call to a field office or supplier. | ||
| Screening supplier plots | Supplier polygons are checked once in a review cycle, against the last annual map. | Load your sourcing polygons as the monitoring area and new clearings inside or beside them appear in the weekly list. |
| Deciding what happens next | The analyst or sustainability lead weighs each case against a file, a contract or a campaign plan. | The same people decide. The list reaches them sooner and says where to look. |
| Still yours Enforcement referrals, supplier decisions and any legal step. Nothing is sent on automatically. | ||
One set of files per week for your monitoring area, in formats your GIS and case files already take.
New clearings flagged since the last pass, one row per polygon, with the date of the pass that found each. It is the file your analyst opens on Monday.
Finding new clearingsHectares flagged per alert, taken from the pass that detected it. Use it to rank the list and to decide what goes to the field first.
Sizing what was clearedThe same polygons as a layer to drop over your concession, supply shed or jurisdiction boundary in the GIS you already run.
Screening supplier plotsThe week's alerts laid out for an enforcement referral or a supplier query, with the fields a case file asks for. Your team adds the evidence and sends it.
Building the list for the field officeYou send the area once. The list comes back every week.
A boundary file: a concession, a supply shed, a district or a set of supplier plots. Tell us who should get the list.
We take the next medium-resolution multispectral pass over the area with a clear view of the ground.
The new pass is compared with the one before. Ground that was forest and no longer is gets flagged as a clearing alert.
The alert list, cleared-area estimates and map layer go out to the people you named.
Read these before you build a routine around the list.

The imagery is optical. Under persistent cloud there is no clear pass, and a clearing waits for the next one. We do not report what we have not seen.
At 3–10 m a pixel is 3 to 10 metres across. A clearing needs several pixels to show up. Selective logging, narrow tracks and single trees may not register until they grow.
Alerts follow the cloud-free pass and go out within days of it. This is not a live feed, and a clearing that starts and finishes between passes is seen late.
Each alert marks ground that changed. A person decides whether it is a clearing for your purposes. Some flags will turn out not to be.
The list says where and roughly how much. It cannot say who cleared it, for what, or whether they had a permit.
No. Your analyst still looks at the evidence. The list says which districts to look at first.
Hold the first weeks of alerts up against your field reports, permits and the imagery you already use. If something looks wrong, send it back and we will go through that week's pass with you.
The alert waits for the next cloud-free pass. We do not guess at a clearing we have not seen.
It is tied to the 3–10 m pass. Small or partial clearings near that limit may not register until they grow.
No. Alerts are flagged for your team to review. Nothing is referred on without a person.
No. It is weekly, tied to the next cloud-free pass.
There is no direct integration. You get GeoJSON and CSV, which open in the GIS and spreadsheet tools you already run.
Your boundary stays yours. What you can do with the alert files, and the licence on the imagery behind them, is written into the project agreement before the first week runs.
It depends on the size of the monitoring area and how long you want it watched, so we quote after we have seen the boundary. There is no price list on this page.
A concession, a supply shed or a district is enough. Tell us who should get the weekly list and we will scope the project from there.